rebase: update replaced k8s.io modules to v0.33.0

Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/doc.go

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ limitations under the License.
 // Package policy is for any kind of policy object.  Suitable examples, even if
 // they aren't all here, are PodDisruptionBudget,
 // NetworkPolicy, etc.
-package v1 // import "k8s.io/api/policy/v1"
+package v1

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/generated.proto

@@ -115,9 +115,6 @@ message PodDisruptionBudgetSpec {
   // Additional policies may be added in the future.
   // Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods
   // if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
-  //
-  // This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when
-  // the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
   // +optional
   optional string unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = 4;
 }

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/types.go

@@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ type PodDisruptionBudgetSpec struct {
 	// Additional policies may be added in the future.
 	// Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods
 	// if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
-	//
-	// This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when
-	// the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
 	// +optional
 	UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType `json:"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy"`
 }

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1/types_swagger_doc_generated.go

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ var map_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec = map[string]string{
 	"minAvailable":               "An eviction is allowed if at least \"minAvailable\" pods selected by \"selector\" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod.  So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying \"100%\".",
 	"selector":                   "Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector will match no pods, while an empty ({}) selector will select all pods within the namespace.",
 	"maxUnavailable":             "An eviction is allowed if at most \"maxUnavailable\" pods selected by \"selector\" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with \"minAvailable\".",
-	"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.\n\nThis field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).",
+	"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.",
 }
 
 func (PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) SwaggerDoc() map[string]string {

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/doc.go

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ limitations under the License.
 // Package policy is for any kind of policy object.  Suitable examples, even if
 // they aren't all here, are PodDisruptionBudget,
 // NetworkPolicy, etc.
-package v1beta1 // import "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
+package v1beta1

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/generated.proto

@@ -115,9 +115,6 @@ message PodDisruptionBudgetSpec {
   // Additional policies may be added in the future.
   // Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods
   // if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
-  //
-  // This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when
-  // the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
   // +optional
   optional string unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = 4;
 }

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/types.go

@@ -67,9 +67,6 @@ type PodDisruptionBudgetSpec struct {
 	// Additional policies may be added in the future.
 	// Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods
 	// if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.
-	//
-	// This field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when
-	// the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).
 	// +optional
 	UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType `json:"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy"`
 }

e2e/vendor/k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1/types_swagger_doc_generated.go

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ var map_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec = map[string]string{
 	"minAvailable":               "An eviction is allowed if at least \"minAvailable\" pods selected by \"selector\" will still be available after the eviction, i.e. even in the absence of the evicted pod.  So for example you can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying \"100%\".",
 	"selector":                   "Label query over pods whose evictions are managed by the disruption budget. A null selector selects no pods. An empty selector ({}) also selects no pods, which differs from standard behavior of selecting all pods. In policy/v1, an empty selector will select all pods in the namespace.",
 	"maxUnavailable":             "An eviction is allowed if at most \"maxUnavailable\" pods selected by \"selector\" are unavailable after the eviction, i.e. even in absence of the evicted pod. For example, one can prevent all voluntary evictions by specifying 0. This is a mutually exclusive setting with \"minAvailable\".",
-	"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.\n\nThis field is beta-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (enabled by default).",
+	"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.",
 }
 
 func (PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) SwaggerDoc() map[string]string {