This commit reverts the initial implementation of the
multi-node-multi-writer feature:
commit: b5b8e46460
It replaces that implementation with a more restrictive version that
only allows multi-node-multi-writer for volumes of type `block`
With this change there are no volume parameters required in the stoarge
class, we also fail any attempt to create a file based device with
multi-node-multi-write being specified, this way a user doesn't have to
wait until they try and do the publish before realizing it doesn't work.
This change adds the ability to define a `multiNodeWritable` option in
the Storage Class.
This change does a number of things:
1. Allow multi-node-multi-writer access modes if the SC options is
enabled
2. Bypass the watcher checks for MultiNodeMultiWriter Volumes
3. Maintains existing watcher checks for SingleNodeWriter access modes
regardless of the StorageClass option.
fix lint-errors
currently all the created volumes are
stored in the metadata store, so we
can use this information to support
list volumes.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
pkg/rbd/rbd.go:67:65⚠️ exported func NewNodeServer
returns unexported type *rbd.nodeServer, which can be
annoying to use (golint)
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
it wont be meaningful to call cephfs.NewcephfsDriver()
to get a new driver, it will be better if we call
cephfs.GetNewDriver() which returns the cephfs driver
object.
same goes for rbd also
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
