there can be a change we can reconcile same
PV parallelly we can endup in generating and
deleting multiple omap keys. to be on safer
side taking lock to process one volumeHandle
at a time.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
In the case of the Async DR, the volumeID will
not be the same if the clusterID or the PoolID
is different, With Earlier implementation, it
is expected that the new volumeID mapping is
stored in the rados omap pool. In the case of the
ControllerExpand or the DeleteVolume Request,
the only volumeID will be sent it's not possible
to find the corresponding poolID in the new cluster.
With This Change, it works as below
The csi-rbdplugin-controller will watch for the PV
objects, when there are any PV objects created it
will check the omap already exists, If the omap doesn't
exist it will generate the new volumeID and it checks for
the volumeID mapping entry in the PV annotation, if the
mapping does not exist, it will add the new entry
to the PV annotation.
The cephcsi will check for the PV annotations if the
omap does not exist if the mapping exists in the PV
annotation, it will use the new volumeID for further
operations.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
if the user has created a static PV for a RBD
image which is not created by CSI driver, dont
generate the OMAP data.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
In the case of Disaster Recovery failover, the
user expected to create the static PVC's. We have
planned not to go with the PVC name and namespace
for many reasons (as in kubernetes it's planned to
support PVC transfer to a new namespace with a
different name and with new features coming in
like data populator etc). For now, we are
planning to go with static PVC's to support
async mirroring.
During Async mirroring only the RBD images are
mirrored to the secondary site, and when the
user creates the static PVC's on the failover
we need to regenerate the omap data. The
volumeHandler in PV spec is an encoded string
which contains clusterID and poolID and image UUID,
The clusterID and poolID won't remain same on both
the clusters, for that cephcsi need to generate the
new volume handler and its to create a mapping
between new volume handler and old volume handler
with that whenever cephcsi gets csi requests it
check if the mapping exists it will pull the new
volume handler and continues other operations.
The new controller watches for the PVs created,
It checks if the omap exists if it doesn't it
will regenerate the entire omap data.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
