The new `vaultAuthNamespace` configuration parameter can be set to the
Vault Namespace where the authentication is setup in the service. Some
Hashicorp Vault deployments use sub-namespaces for their users/tenants,
with a 'root' namespace where the authentication is configured. This
requires passing of different Vault namespaces for different operations.
Example:
- the Kubernetes Auth mechanism is configured for in the Vault
Namespace called 'devops'
- a user/tenant has a sub-namespace called 'devops/website' where the
encryption passphrases can be placed in the key-value store
The configuration for this, then looks like:
vaultAuthNamespace: devops
vaultNamespace: devops/homepage
Note that Vault Namespaces are a feature of the Hashicorp Vault
Enterprise product, and not part of the Open Source version. This
prevents adding e2e tests that validate the Vault Namespace
configuration.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
It seems that the version of the key/value engine can not always be
detected for Hashicorp Vault. In certain cases, it is required to
configure the `VAULT_BACKEND` (or `vaultBackend`) option so that a
successful connection to the service can be made.
The `kv-v2` is the current default for development deployments of
Hashicorp Vault (what we use for automated testing). Production
deployments default to version 1 for now.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
nlreturn linter requires a new line before return
and branch statements except when the return is alone
inside a statement group (such as an if statement) to
increase code clarity. This commit addresses such issues.
Updates: #1586
Signed-off-by: Rakshith R <rar@redhat.com>
This makes the Tenant configuration for Hashicorp Vault KMS connections
more modular. Additional KMS implementations that use Hashicorp Vault
with per-Tenant options can re-use the new vaultTenantConnection.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
The Go linter paralleltest checks that the t.Parallel
gets called for the test method and for the range of
test cases within the test.
Updates: #2025
Signed-off-by: Yati Padia <ypadia@redhat.com>
There is no need for each EncryptionKMS to implement the same GetID()
function. We have a VolumeEncryption type that is more suitable for
keeping track of the KMS-ID that was used to get the configuration of
the KMS.
This does not change any metadata that is stored anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
GetKMS() is the public API that initilizes the KMS providers on demand.
Each provider identifies itself with a KMS-Type, and adds its own
initialization function to a switch/case construct. This is not well
maintainable.
The new GetKMS() can be used the same way, but uses the new kmsManager
interface to create and configure the KMS provider instances.
All existing KMS providers are converted to use the new kmsManager
plugins API.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
"VAULT_SKIP_VERIFY" is a standard Hashicorp Vault environment variable
(a string) that needs to get converted to the "vaultCAVerify"
configuration option in the Ceph-CSI format.
The value of "VAULT_SKIP_VERIFY" means the reverse of "vaultCAVerify",
this part was missing in the original conversion too.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Added a option to pass the client certificate
and the client certificate key for the vault token
based encryption.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Tenants (Kubernetes Namespaces) can use their own Vault Token to manage
the encryption keys for PVCs. The working is documented in #1743.
See-also: #1743Closes: #1500
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
