Several places in the code compared errors directly with the go-ceph
sentinel errors. This change uses the errors.Is() function of go
1.13 instead. The err113 linter reported this issue as:
err113: do not compare errors directly, use errors.Is() instead
Signed-off-by: Sven Anderson <sven@redhat.com>
The previous function used to remove omap keys apparently did not
return errors when removing omap keys from a missing omap (oid).
Mimic that behavior when using the api.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
For any function that sets more than one key on a single oid setting
them as a batch will be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
For any function that removes more than one key on a single oid removing
them as a batch will be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
Taking this appraoch means that any function that must get more than one
key's value from the same oid can be more efficient by calling out to
ceph only once.
To be cautious and avoid missing things we always request ceph return
more keys than we actually expect to be set on the oid. If there are
unexpected keys there, we will not miss the keys we want if we first hit
an unexpected key if we were to limit ourselves to iterating only over
the number of keys we're expecting to be on the object.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
These new omap manipulation functions (get/set/remove) are roughly
equivalent to the previous command-line based approach but rely
on direct api calls to ceph.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
