The SnapshotClass for RBD requires a pool parameter. This is redundant
as a snapshot is not created on a different pool than the source image
of the snapshot (refer rbd man page).
Further, when a snapshot needs to be created its source CSI VolumeID
is passed to the creation call, and hence the source volumes pool
needs to be reused to create the snapshot.
Similarly to clone a snapshot, the create request would come in with a
SnapshotID to help identify the snapshot pool, and the same create
request parameters would contain the storage class based pool parameter
to create the clone into (as clones can be in different pools as
compared to their parent snapshots).
Thus, the parameter pool seems redundant in the snapshot class and
should be removed to improve ease of use.
Fixes#379
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Existing config maps are now replaced with rados omaps that help
store information regarding the requested volume names and the rbd
image names backing the same.
Further to detect cluster, pool and which image a volume ID refers
to, changes to volume ID encoding has been done as per provided
design specification in the stateless ceph-csi proposal.
Additional changes and updates,
- Updated documentation
- Updated manifests
- Updated Helm chart
- Addressed a few csi-test failures
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Based on the review comments addressed the following,
- Moved away from having to update the pod with volumes
when a new Ceph cluster is added for provisioning via the
CSI driver
- The above now used k8s APIs to fetch secrets
- TBD: Need to add a watch mechanisim such that these
secrets can be cached and updated when changed
- Folded the Cephc configuration and ID/key config map
and secrets into a single secret
- Provided the ability to read the same config via mapped
or created files within the pod
Tests:
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using new scheme
StorageClass
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using older scheme
to ensure nothing is broken
- Did not execute snapshot related tests
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
This commit provides the option to pass in Ceph cluster-id instead
of a MON list from the storage class.
This helps in moving towards a stateless CSI implementation.
Tested the following,
- PV provisioning and staging using cluster-id in storage class
- PV provisioning and staging using MON list in storage class
Did not test,
- snapshot operations in either forms of the storage class
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
This commit reverts the initial implementation of the
multi-node-multi-writer feature:
commit: b5b8e46460
It replaces that implementation with a more restrictive version that
only allows multi-node-multi-writer for volumes of type `block`
With this change there are no volume parameters required in the stoarge
class, we also fail any attempt to create a file based device with
multi-node-multi-write being specified, this way a user doesn't have to
wait until they try and do the publish before realizing it doesn't work.
This change adds the ability to define a `multiNodeWritable` option in
the Storage Class.
This change does a number of things:
1. Allow multi-node-multi-writer access modes if the SC options is
enabled
2. Bypass the watcher checks for MultiNodeMultiWriter Volumes
3. Maintains existing watcher checks for SingleNodeWriter access modes
regardless of the StorageClass option.
fix lint-errors
