The KMSProvider struct is a simple, extendable type that can be used to
register KMS providers with an internal kmsManager.
Helper functions for creating and configuring KMS providers will also be
located in the new kms.go file. This makes things more modular and
better maintainable.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Current rbd plugin only supports the layering feature
for rbd image. Add exclusive-lock and journaling image
features for the rbd.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: woohhan <woohyung_han@tmax.co.kr>
Failed to delete voluesnapshot when backend subvolume
(pvc) and ceph fs subvolume snapshot is deleted
Fixes#1647
Signed-off-by: Yati Padia <ypadia@redhat.com>
rbdVolumes can have several resources that get allocated during its
usage. Only destroying the IOContext may not be suffiecient and can
cause resource leaks.
Use rbdVolume.Destroy() when the rbdVolume is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Connections are reference counted, so just assigning the connection to
an other object for re-use is not correct. This can cause connections to
be garbage collected while something else is still using it.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
as RBD is implementing the replication
we are registering it. For CephFS, its
not implementing the replication we are
passing nil so we dont want to register
it.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Because rbdVolume and rbdSnapshot are very similar, they can be based
off a common struct rbdImage that contains the common attributes and
functions.
This makes it possible to re-use functions for snapshots, and prevents
further duplication or code.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
The rbdSnapshot and rbdVolume structs have many common attributes. In
order to combine these into an rbdImage struct that implements shared
functionality, having the same attribute for the ID makes things much
easier.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
This new KMS is based on the (default) SecretsKMS, but instead of using
the passphrase for all volumes, the passphrase is used to
encrypt/decrypt a Data-Encryption-Key that is stored in the metadata of
the volume.
CC: Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@redhat.com> - for encryption guidance
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
By adding these methods, a KMS can explicitly encrypt/decrypt the DEK if
there is no transparent way of doing so.
Hashicorp Vault encrypts the DEK when it it stored, and decrypts it when
fetched. Therefor there is no need to do any encryption in this case.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
NewVolumeEncryption() will return an indication that an alternative
DEKStore needs to be configured in case the KMS does not support it.
setKMS() will also set the DEKStore if needed, so renaming it to
configureEncryption() makes things clearer.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Use DEKStore API for Fetching and Storing passphrases.
Drop the fallback for the old KMS interface that is now provided as
DEKStore. The original implementation has been re-used for the DEKStore
interface.
This also moves GetCryptoPassphrase/StoreNewCryptoPassphrase functions
to methods of VolumeEncryption.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
DEKStore is a new interface that will be used for Storing and Fetching
DEKs. The existing implementations for KMS already function as a
DEKStore, and will be updated to match the interface.
By splitting KMS and DEKStore into two components, the encryption
configuration for volumes becomes more modular. This makes it possible
to implement a DEKStore where the encrypted DEK for a volume is stored
in the metadata of the volume (RBD image).
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Prepare for grouping encryption related functions together. The main
rbdVolume object should not be cluttered with KMS or DEK procedures.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Prepared for an enhanced API to communicate with a KMS and keep the DEK
storage separate. The crypto.go file is already mixed with different
functions, so moving the KMS part into its own file, just like we have
for Hashicorp Vault KMS's.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
For NodeUnstageVolume its a two step process,
first unmount the volume and than unmap the volume.
Currently, we are logging only after rbd unmapping is done.
sometimes it becomes difficult to debug with above logging
whether more time is spent in unmount or unmap.
This commits adds one more debug log after unmount is done.
with this we can identify where exactly more time is spent
by looking at the logs.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
It seems that writing more than 1 GiB per WriteSame() operation causes
an EINVAL (22) "Invalid argument" error. Splitting the writes in blocks
of maximum 1 GiB should prevent that from happening.
Not all volumes are of a size that is the multiple of the stripe-size.
WriteSame() needs to write full blocks of data, so in case there is a
small left-over, it will be filled with WriteAt().
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Introduce initKMS() as a function of rbdVolume. KMS functionality does
not need to pollute general RBD image functions. Encryption functions
are now in internal/rbd.encryption.go, so move initKMS() there as well.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
when user provides an option for VolumeNamePrefix
create subvolume with the prefix which will be easy
for user to identify the subvolumes belongs to
the storageclass.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
When and RBD image is expanded, the additional extents need to get
allocated when the image was thick-provisioned.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
When images get resized/expanded, the additional space needs to be
allocated if the image was initially thick-provisioned. By marking the
image with a "thick-provisioned" key in the metadata, future operations
can check the need.
A missing "thick-provisioned" key indicates that the image has not been
thick-provisioned.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Write blocks of stripe-size to allocate RBD images when
Thick-Provisioning is enabled in the StorageClass.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Add an option to the StorageClass to support creating fully allocated
(thick provisioned) RBD images
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
When a volume was provisioned by an old Ceph-CSI provisioner, the
metadata of the RBD image will contain `requiresEncryption` to indicate
a passphrase needs to be created. New Ceph-CSI provisioners create the
passphrase in the CreateVolume request, and set `encryptionPrepared`
instead.
When a new node-plugin detects that `requiresEncryption` is set in the
RBD image metadata, it will fallback to the old behaviour.
In case `encryptionPrepared` is read from the RBD image metadata, the
passphrase is used to cryptsetup/format the image.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
This adds internal/rbd/encryption.go which will be used to include other
encryption functionality to support additional KMS related functions. It
will work together with the shared API from internal/util/kms.go.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Storing a passphrase is now done while the volume is created. There is
no need to (re)generate a passphrase when it can not be found.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Have the provisioner create the passphrase for the volume, instead of
doign it lazily at the time the volume is used for the 1st time. This
prevents potential races where pods on different nodes try to store
different passphrases at the (almost) same time.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
"VAULT_SKIP_VERIFY" is a standard Hashicorp Vault environment variable
(a string) that needs to get converted to the "vaultCAVerify"
configuration option in the Ceph-CSI format.
The value of "VAULT_SKIP_VERIFY" means the reverse of "vaultCAVerify",
this part was missing in the original conversion too.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
It seems that calls to addRbdManagerTask() do not include the
rados-namespace in the image location. Functions calling
addRbdManagerTask() construct the image location themselves, but should
use rbdVolume.String() to include all the attributes.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
There are many usecases with adding the subvolume
path to the PV object. the volume context returned
in the createVolumeResponse is added to the PV object
by the external provisioner.
More Details about the usecases are in below link
https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/5471
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
the tenant/namespace is needed to read the certificates,
this commit sets the tenant in kms object.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
currently, the keys for kms certificates/keys in a
secret is ca.cert, tls.cert and
tls.key, this commit changes the key from ca.cert
and tls.cert to cert and tls.key to key.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
if are reading the kms data from the file.
than only we need to unmarshal. If we are reading
from the configmap it already returns the unmarshal
data.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
The configuration option `EnvVaultInsecure` is expected to be a string,
not a boolean. By converting the bool back to a string (after
verification), it is now possible to skip the certificate validation
check by setting `vaultCAVerify: false` in the Vault configuration.
Fixes: #1852
Reported-by: Bryon Nevis <bryon.nevis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
When the KMS VaultTokens is configured through a Kubernetens ConfigMap,
the `VAULT_SKIP_VERIFY` option was not taken into account. The option
maps to the `vaultCAVerify` value in the configuration file, but has the
reverse meaning.
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
This can happen when the subvolume is in snapshot-retained state.
We should not return error for such case as it is a valid situation.
Signed-off-by: Mudit Agarwal <muagarwa@redhat.com>