RBD plugin needs only a single ID to manage images and operations against a
pool, mentioned in the storage class. The current scheme of 2 IDs is hence not
needed and removed in this commit.
Further, unlike CephFS plugin, the RBD plugin splits the user id and the key
into the storage class and the secret respectively. Also the parameter name
for the key in the secret is noted in the storageclass making it a variant and
hampers usability/comprehension. This is also fixed by moving the id and the key
to the secret and not retaining the same in the storage class, like CephFS.
Fixes#270
Testing done:
- Basic PVC creation and mounting
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Existing config maps are now replaced with rados omaps that help
store information regarding the requested volume names and the rbd
image names backing the same.
Further to detect cluster, pool and which image a volume ID refers
to, changes to volume ID encoding has been done as per provided
design specification in the stateless ceph-csi proposal.
Additional changes and updates,
- Updated documentation
- Updated manifests
- Updated Helm chart
- Addressed a few csi-test failures
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
Based on the review comments addressed the following,
- Moved away from having to update the pod with volumes
when a new Ceph cluster is added for provisioning via the
CSI driver
- The above now used k8s APIs to fetch secrets
- TBD: Need to add a watch mechanisim such that these
secrets can be cached and updated when changed
- Folded the Cephc configuration and ID/key config map
and secrets into a single secret
- Provided the ability to read the same config via mapped
or created files within the pod
Tests:
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using new scheme
StorageClass
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using older scheme
to ensure nothing is broken
- Did not execute snapshot related tests
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
This commit provides the option to pass in Ceph cluster-id instead
of a MON list from the storage class.
This helps in moving towards a stateless CSI implementation.
Tested the following,
- PV provisioning and staging using cluster-id in storage class
- PV provisioning and staging using MON list in storage class
Did not test,
- snapshot operations in either forms of the storage class
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
This commit reverts the initial implementation of the
multi-node-multi-writer feature:
commit: b5b8e46460
It replaces that implementation with a more restrictive version that
only allows multi-node-multi-writer for volumes of type `block`
With this change there are no volume parameters required in the stoarge
class, we also fail any attempt to create a file based device with
multi-node-multi-write being specified, this way a user doesn't have to
wait until they try and do the publish before realizing it doesn't work.
This change adds the ability to define a `multiNodeWritable` option in
the Storage Class.
This change does a number of things:
1. Allow multi-node-multi-writer access modes if the SC options is
enabled
2. Bypass the watcher checks for MultiNodeMultiWriter Volumes
3. Maintains existing watcher checks for SingleNodeWriter access modes
regardless of the StorageClass option.
fix lint-errors
currently all the created volumes are
stored in the metadata store, so we
can use this information to support
list volumes.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
pkg/rbd/rbd.go:67:65⚠️ exported func NewNodeServer
returns unexported type *rbd.nodeServer, which can be
annoying to use (golint)
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
it wont be meaningful to call cephfs.NewcephfsDriver()
to get a new driver, it will be better if we call
cephfs.GetNewDriver() which returns the cephfs driver
object.
same goes for rbd also
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <mrajanna@redhat.com>
