This commit reverts the initial implementation of the
multi-node-multi-writer feature:
commit: b5b8e46460
It replaces that implementation with a more restrictive version that
only allows multi-node-multi-writer for volumes of type `block`
With this change there are no volume parameters required in the stoarge
class, we also fail any attempt to create a file based device with
multi-node-multi-write being specified, this way a user doesn't have to
wait until they try and do the publish before realizing it doesn't work.
This change adds the ability to define a `multiNodeWritable` option in
the Storage Class.
This change does a number of things:
1. Allow multi-node-multi-writer access modes if the SC options is
enabled
2. Bypass the watcher checks for MultiNodeMultiWriter Volumes
3. Maintains existing watcher checks for SingleNodeWriter access modes
regardless of the StorageClass option.
fix lint-errors
This PR is trying to fix the issue #34. We use 'RBD_IMAGE_NAME' and
'RBD_IMAGE_VERSION' instead of the obsolete 'IMAGE_NAME' and 'IMAGE_VERSION'
to address this issue.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
