Add rules and variables to the Makefile so that the unified binary
and container image can be built.
Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
if attacher is not enabled, we need to
create the csidriver CRD with spec
to make attachRequired as false to
skip volume attach check in kube.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
adding the condition will help us
to easily remove the attacher later.
or even we can add else condition
if we have an alternate to attacher.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
currently we are deploying external-attacher
as a seperate statefulset, which leads to
attacher communicating with the node provisoner
daemonset, This PR deploys external-attacher
as a sidecar container inside provisioner
statefulset, so that external-provisioner
always communicates with the plugin responsible
for the provision controller capcabilities.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Based on the review comments addressed the following,
- Moved away from having to update the pod with volumes
when a new Ceph cluster is added for provisioning via the
CSI driver
- The above now used k8s APIs to fetch secrets
- TBD: Need to add a watch mechanisim such that these
secrets can be cached and updated when changed
- Folded the Cephc configuration and ID/key config map
and secrets into a single secret
- Provided the ability to read the same config via mapped
or created files within the pod
Tests:
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using new scheme
StorageClass
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using older scheme
to ensure nothing is broken
- Did not execute snapshot related tests
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
This commit provides the option to pass in Ceph cluster-id instead
of a MON list from the storage class.
This helps in moving towards a stateless CSI implementation.
Tested the following,
- PV provisioning and staging using cluster-id in storage class
- PV provisioning and staging using MON list in storage class
Did not test,
- snapshot operations in either forms of the storage class
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>