currently, we have 3 docker files(cephcsi,rbd,cephfs) in the ceph-csi repo.
[commit ](85e121ebfe)
added by John to build a single image which can act as rbd or
cephfs based on the input configuration.
This PR updates the makefile and kubernetes templates to use
the unified image and also its deletes the other two dockerfiles.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Existing config maps are now replaced with rados omaps that help
store information regarding the requested volume names and the rbd
image names backing the same.
Further to detect cluster, pool and which image a volume ID refers
to, changes to volume ID encoding has been done as per provided
design specification in the stateless ceph-csi proposal.
Additional changes and updates,
- Updated documentation
- Updated manifests
- Updated Helm chart
- Addressed a few csi-test failures
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
The kubernetes manifests and Helm templates have been updated to use
aggregated ClusterRoles. The same change has been done in Rook as well.
Refer rook/rook#2634 and rook/rook#2975
Signed-off-by: Kaushal M <kshlmster@gmail.com>
PR #290 missed the update permission to persistentvolumes.
Without that permission, you will get the following error when attaching a RBD volume to a pod:
```
Warning FailedAttachVolume 100s (x11 over 7m52s) attachdetach-controller AttachVolume.Attach failed for volume "pvc-d23f8745-60bb-11e9-bd35-5254001c78d6" : could not add PersistentVolume finalizer: persistentvolumes "pvc-d23f8745-60bb-11e9-bd35-5254001c78d6" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:kube-system:rbd-csi-provisioner" cannot update resource "persistentvolumes" in API group "" at the cluster scope
```
if attacher is not enabled, we need to
create the csidriver CRD with spec
to make attachRequired as false to
skip volume attach check in kube.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
adding the condition will help us
to easily remove the attacher later.
or even we can add else condition
if we have an alternate to attacher.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
currently we are deploying external-attacher
as a seperate statefulset, which leads to
attacher communicating with the node provisoner
daemonset, This PR deploys external-attacher
as a sidecar container inside provisioner
statefulset, so that external-provisioner
always communicates with the plugin responsible
for the provision controller capcabilities.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
Based on the review comments addressed the following,
- Moved away from having to update the pod with volumes
when a new Ceph cluster is added for provisioning via the
CSI driver
- The above now used k8s APIs to fetch secrets
- TBD: Need to add a watch mechanisim such that these
secrets can be cached and updated when changed
- Folded the Cephc configuration and ID/key config map
and secrets into a single secret
- Provided the ability to read the same config via mapped
or created files within the pod
Tests:
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using new scheme
StorageClass
- Ran PV creation/deletion/attach/use using older scheme
to ensure nothing is broken
- Did not execute snapshot related tests
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
as the socket directory will be created
inside the container no need to follow
the plugin name in for the directory
creation, this will also reduce the code
changes if we want to change driver name.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
remove unwanted rules and update
rbac to have permission to modify
endpoints and configmaps in the
current namespace.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
