mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-csi.git
synced 2024-11-15 02:40:23 +00:00
5cd2930744
we dont support imageFormat anymore in cephcsi and default is set to 2, removing its reference from the repo. Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
101 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
101 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# RBD MIRRORING
|
||
|
||
RBD mirroring is a process of replication of RBD images between two or more Ceph
|
||
clusters. Mirroring ensures point-in-time, crash-consistent RBD images between
|
||
clusters, RBD mirroring is mainly used for disaster recovery (i.e. having a
|
||
secondary site as a failover).
|
||
See [Ceph documentation](https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rbd/rbd-mirroring) on
|
||
RBD mirroring for complete information.
|
||
|
||
## Architecture
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Design
|
||
|
||
Currently, CEPH-CSI generates its unique ID for each RBD image and stores the
|
||
corresponding PersistentVolume (PV) name and the unique ID mapping, It creates
|
||
the RBD image with the unique ID and returns the encoded value which contains
|
||
all the required information for other operations. For mirroring, the same RBD
|
||
image will be mirrored to the secondary cluster. As the journal(OMAP data) is
|
||
not mirrored to the secondary cluster, The RBD images corresponding to the PV
|
||
can not be identified without OMAP data.
|
||
|
||
**Pre-req** It's expected that the Kubernetes Admin/User will create the static
|
||
PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) on the secondary site during the failover.
|
||
|
||
**Note:** when the static PVC created on the secondary site we cannot use the
|
||
VolumeHandle to identify the OMAP data nor the image anymore because as we have
|
||
only PoolID and ClusterID in the VolumeHandle. We cannot identify the correct
|
||
pool name from the PoolID because pool name will remain the same on both
|
||
clusters but not the PoolID even the ClusterID can be different on the secondary
|
||
cluster.
|
||
|
||
> Sample PV spec which will be used by rbdplugin controller to regenerate OMAP
|
||
> data
|
||
|
||
```yaml
|
||
csi:
|
||
controllerExpandSecretRef:
|
||
name: rook-csi-rbd-provisioner
|
||
namespace: rook-ceph
|
||
driver: rook-ceph.rbd.csi.ceph.com
|
||
fsType: ext4
|
||
nodeStageSecretRef:
|
||
name: rook-csi-rbd-node
|
||
namespace: rook-ceph
|
||
volumeAttributes:
|
||
clusterID: rook-ceph
|
||
imageFeatures: layering
|
||
imageName: csi-vol-0c23de1c-18fb-11eb-a903-0242ac110005
|
||
journalPool: replicapool
|
||
pool: replicapool
|
||
radosNamespace: ""
|
||
volumeHandle: 0001-0009-rook-ceph-0000000000000002-0c23de1c-18fb-11eb-a903-0242ac110005
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
> **VolumeHandle** is the unique volume name returned by the CSI volume plugin’s
|
||
> CreateVolume to refer to the volume on all subsequent calls.
|
||
|
||
Once the static PVC is created on the secondary cluster, the Kubernetes User can
|
||
try to delete the PVC,expand the PVC or mount the PVC. In case of mounting
|
||
(NodeStageVolume) we will get the volume context in RPC call but not in the
|
||
Delete/Expand Request. In Delete/Expand RPC request only the VolumeHandle
|
||
(`clusterID-poolID-volumeuniqueID`) will be sent where it contains the encoded
|
||
information related to ClusterID and PoolID. The VolumeHandle is not useful in
|
||
secondary cluster as the PoolID and ClusterID always may not be the same.
|
||
|
||
> In this design document we will talk about new controller(rbdplugin
|
||
> controller) not replication controller, in next releases we will design the
|
||
> replication controller to perform mirroring operations. The rbdplugin
|
||
> controller will run as a sidecar in RBD provisioner pod.
|
||
|
||
To solve this problem, We will have a new controller(rbdplugin controller)
|
||
running as part of provisioner pod which watches for the PV objects. When a PV
|
||
is created it will extract the required information from the PV spec, and it
|
||
will regenerate the OMAP data. Whenever Ceph-CSI gets a RPC request with older
|
||
VolumeHandle, it will check if any new VolumeHandle exists for the old
|
||
VolumeHandle. If yes, it uses the new VolumeHandle for internal operations (to
|
||
get pool name, Ceph monitor details from the ClusterID etc).
|
||
|
||
Currently, We are making use of watchers in node stage request to make sure
|
||
ReadWriteOnce (RWO) PVC is mounted on a single node at a given point in time. We
|
||
need to change the watchers logic in the node stage request as when we enable
|
||
the RBD mirroring on an image, a watcher will be added on a RBD image by the rbd
|
||
mirroring daemon.
|
||
|
||
To solve the ClusterID problem, If the ClusterID is different on the second
|
||
cluster, the admin has to create a new ConfigMap for the mapped ClusterID's.
|
||
Whenever Ceph-CSI gets a request, it will check if the ClusterID mapping exists
|
||
and uses the mapped ClusterID to get the information like Ceph monitors etc.
|
||
Details about creation of clusterID's mapping are available at
|
||
[clusterID-mapping](./clusterid-mapping.md).
|
||
|
||
**This design does not cover the below items:**
|
||
|
||
* Bootstrapping RBD mirror daemon.
|
||
* Mirroring of PVC snapshots
|
||
* Mirroring for topology provisioned PVC.
|
||
* Documenting the steps to handle failover/fallback of an image.
|
||
* Workflow of a Replication controller.
|